Motion of debate to new concept

We are very much conscious of our smartness. Smartness is well related with delivery of speech. We often think that talking freestyle is the hallmark of smartness. So, we pamper freestyle talking to exhibit our smartness without any idea of the consequential effect of it. Happy-go-lucky talking with underscoring substantiality is inversely proportional to smartness that we want to acquire. Many of us are in the habit of talking aloud while establishing their line of action. They are under the impression that they will outshout others standing against his line of thinking or line of action. But this conception is absolutely baseless. It creates a pandemonium and ultimately logical battle is ended in a fiasco. This is a very common picture with all usualness.

One thing we often do not keep in our mind that delivery of speech, mode of speech, substance in the speech are the cause of pregnancy of motion of debate to new concept as the resultant achievement. We often try to convince others within the frame of our own logical presentations or arguments. But in many of those our attempts stand futile. In that case we transfer the responsibility on him sitting on the opposite side of the table. Thus we shake of our own responsibility and limitation. To bring one within our conceptual boundary it requires tremendous patience and convincing capacity. How to convince others is a long way to walk. We can never achieve it with a magic stroke. A motion of debate is sure to come up on placement of any conceptual idea. It is nothing uncommon at all because mental set up each and everyone is different and their line of thinking never lies on the same straight line i.e. concurrence of thinking of all on a definite issue is a utopia. There must be certain differences and it is the fundamental reality not to be ignored in any way.

Then delivery of speech is a well worth factor to count. When we want to convince anyone in particular delivery and mode of speech plays a pivotal role. The way of talking must be impressive with all convincing elements. Education and acquired knowledge ameliorate convincing capacity. When a motion of debate arises we should never forget that the outcome of this debate will be the genesis of new concept at the conclusion. A debate originates from different angle of view. A motion of debate does not signify contradiction for contradiction sake. That contradiction must be logic abiding. A debate with no specific logic creates pandemonium. A debate is called the perfect debate what substantiates certain logical explanation in theme and idea. When a debater is well equipped with weapons of strong argument hardly to be challenged he remains very cool during debate and no restlessness is marked in him. His mode of vibrant speech with enough substantiality never allows his contestant to come up on the front foot for a counter debate. Illogical debate encourages unnecessary howling and it perverts the delivery and mode of speech. Delivery or mode of speech being perverted is originated out of misconception and it is undeniable.

Above all delivery of speech, mode of speech and substance in the speech generate amiable disposition and it elates the basic qualities of man. If a man is enriched with qualitative elements his placements in course of debate are enough fertile with logic, arguments and contents. In fact those stand irrefutable and irrefutable debate is the origin of new concept and new ideas. So, a hard debate is very much mandatory at the time of conceptualizing any idea because no idea should be taken as granted without litmus test. The more the debate will continue in a healthy atmosphere, the more the analytical concept will be generated and the society is in need of that.