Recipe of creative art and writing

To create something with a marked difference is the basic instinct of every individual. “ART FOR ART SAKE” is a very common understanding. Art never wants to be captivated within a specific ambit. Many of the elites are under the impression that both art and culture should have a free wheals to move because art and culture are averse to carry out any instruction. Creative art is a natural flow. A swift mountain stream adjusts itself on its own flowing track. It overrules any directive or obstacle. So as the creative art is. Creativity depends on the mental set up of the creator. Mind grossly dislikes direct supervision of anybody else. Mind moves according to own sweet will. Any formulated track to move is contradictory to its basic properties. Willingness or unwillingness is not the slave to anyone in particular. As creative art or creative literature is the projection or better be called reflection of our thinking and ideas it disregards any encroachment to that. None but the creator has only the requisite passport to regulate the gear of his/her mind.

There exists much appropriateness in this line of thinking. Creative art or creative literature is the perfect exposition of the beauty of mind. How will the creator beatify his mind it is his/her personal affair. A creator never mortgages his/her sense of beauty to anybody else. He/she creates his/her creation with unbounding pleasure. This pleasure subscribes the optimum delight in his/her mind and it prefers to remain inexpressive. When beauty of creation regulates the movements of the creator it is the feeling of exquisite loveliness and it leads the creator to an unknown world where his presence is only felt.

But when the creator wants to supersede the boundary of country and time with his/her creation he should not create from aesthetic sense of view. Without underscoring the sense of aestheticism even the least in creativity every art and literature deserves high acclaim when it leaves certain distinctive appeal to the society with an intricate bonding social, moral and human values. That very creation is called time-crossing and age-unbounding. A creative litterateur appeases his mental appetite without bypassing the commitment to the society. Sometimes time underscores his personal demand and personal willingness or unwillingness. Creative art and literature accelerate the storm in our mind for a better tomorrow. It neutralizes the decomposing elements in human brain. A true creation always aims at to do the well being of others. A creation is called no creation at all where obligation part is deliberately ignored. Suppose a creative literature is dignified as superb for its writing skill and presentation. But that very creation will be undervalued if that is not accepted in the parlour of the common mass.

Neither common mass nor the critics only are the best adjudicator of the creative art and creative literature. A painting may be termed as outstanding from the point aesthetes. A literature may be identified as priceless for its composition skill. But if that creativity does not inspire general mass or toiling mass in their life-struggle the essence of that creation is muffed up in confusion. Any creation does not aim at to point out the problem only. It should exhibit the way to come out of the crisis. A creation must have a visionary look subject to the missionary target to protect the decomposing society from further erosion. A creator must have to put up a very strong fight against the engulfing social decadence where his/her creation will act as the medium. That very creation is identified as universal crossing the boundary of ages. There lies the real pleasure of the creator.

I will be recognized as the creator but I will not accept the responsibility and obligation of changing the society where moral values and human values are bottom-touching. It is a greater contradiction and dubious too. A creator should never compromise with his/her ethical senses. He/she must not have a double-speaking mouth. A creator is not supposed to have any intimacy with narrow interest. Constant floor changing attitude of a creator with changing social scenario is always condemnable. It underscores his/her dignity. It damages his/her sense of prestige too. This very attitude confirms that he is not true to his/her conscience. He ignores his/her obligation to social commitment.

But is an irony to say that this tendency is growing up day by day. The creator is forgetting the basic principles of his/her creative identity. He/she gives in before the alluring beckons of safe shelter. It is painful to note that a large section of the creators is mortgaging their self-esteem and self-dignity before the decaying system. They are in a deliberate mood, obviously spoiled to ignore the interest of the common people who propelled his/her creativity a day. This is called the prostitution of ethical values. He/she may be a creator with all round versatility in his creation. But history will never forgive those creators for their betrayal. A creator who denies his source of creation is no better than a vile man. Never to show them any pity- it is the only inference.